Search for: "Hale v. Young"
Results 1 - 20
of 93
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Nov 2011, 3:54 am
On Tuesday 7 November, the Supreme Court (Lady Hale and Lords Walker, Brown, Mance, and Dyson) heard the appeal of the parents of a young woman, Melanie Rabone, who committed suicide while on home release from a psychiatric unit at Stepping Hill Hospital. [read post]
19 Aug 2015, 1:30 am
The decision will therefore benefit many other young people like the appellant who have been living in the UK since a young age. [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 8:00 am
Rather than adults’ rights, two very young British children’s rights hung in the balance. [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 5:22 am
The Appellant mother and the Respondent father lived in Australia with their young son. [read post]
17 Aug 2016, 2:15 am
” Lady Hale agreed, adding that in her view it was “absolutely plain that Parliament did intend there to be such civil liability. [read post]
9 Jan 2017, 2:58 am
Background The Supreme Court has upheld a challenge to the “named person” provisions of the Children and Young People (Scotland) Act 2014. [read post]
12 Jan 2020, 4:32 pm
The Guardian had an article “David Leyonhjelm appeals against court ruling that he defamed Sarah Hanson-Young”. [read post]
7 Mar 2012, 4:02 am
The Supreme Court is currently hearing a series of joined cases concerning extradition and the rights of children including KAS or H v The Lord Advocate UKSC 2011/0217, BH v The Lord Advocate UKSC 2011/0210 , F-K (FC) v Polish Judicial Authority UKSC 2012/0039, R (on the application of HH) v Deputy Prosecutor of the Italian Republic, Genoa UKSC 2011/0128 and R (on the application of PH) v Deputy Prosecutor of the Italian Republic, Genoa UKSC 2011/0129. [read post]
20 May 2015, 3:02 am
Fortunately, and clearly correctly, the Supreme Court answers the question posed in paragraph 1 of the judgment of Lady Hale and Lord Toulson as to whether Wilkinson v. [read post]
28 Jun 2016, 2:32 am
Lord Drummond Young considered that despite differences in the legislation involved, there were “underlying substantive similarities” with Monk v Warbey which supported the view he took of the Act. [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 1:33 am
Savage; Powell v United Kingdom [2000] 30 EHRR CD 362). [read post]
17 Sep 2019, 1:26 am
He says Lord Drummond Young’s view, in relation to the sittings of Parliament in that Act was limited to Northern Ireland was wrong. [read post]
21 Nov 2014, 10:08 am
You may recall in R (M) v Hammersmith LBC [2008] UKHL 14, Baroness Hale, after criticising the authority's failure to carry out an assessment of M for almost all of her judgment, decided that a young person could not be a former relevant child if the authority had not in fact provided the child with accommodation under s.20 even if they should have done. [read post]
29 Nov 2009, 10:29 am
The normal order of things is of course for young people to claim to be older than they really are. [read post]
29 Nov 2009, 10:29 am
The normal order of things is of course for young people to claim to be older than they really are. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 4:04 am
R. and H. v. [read post]
18 Oct 2011, 8:44 am
The government claimed that the amended rule helped stop young British women from being pressurised into sponsoring a fiancée or spouse seeking admission to the UK. [read post]
18 Oct 2011, 8:44 am
The government claimed that the amended rule helped stop young British women from being pressurised into sponsoring a fiancée or spouse seeking admission to the UK. [read post]
3 Feb 2020, 6:36 am
Brenda Hogget (Hale) of Manchester University! [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 1:32 am
Lord Reed, with whom Lord Neuberger, Lady Hale and Lord Clarke agreed, held that the scheme did fall foul of the principle of legality. [read post]
